This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Menu

Welcome to Connected World

Your go-to source for latest insights from our lawyers. Through sharp analysis and commentary, we explore the pressures facing businesses today.

| 1 minute read

DIFC Courts bring instant verification to cross-border court documents

The DIFC Courts have introduced non-transferable digital authenticity credentials, recorded on the Avalanche public blockchain, so that court orders and hearing records can be verified instantly across borders, see the DIFC Courts annoucement here. It is a welcome example of a court putting emerging technology to practical use.

Anyone who has run a cross-border dispute knows how much time and money goes into proving that a document is genuine. Chasing certifications, waiting on legalisation chains and explaining to a counterparty's compliance team why a court order is real can take longer than the legal argument itself. A credential that can be checked in seconds has the potential to remove a lot of that friction, and for disputes lawyers it should make a real difference in practice.

Confidentiality is the obvious concern, and the design answers it well. The contents of documents and the details of the case stay off-chain, and only the proof of provenance and integrity is recorded. Banks, foreign courts and public authorities can therefore verify the document without its contents or confidential case information being published on-chain. The credential is also non-transferable, so it works as proof of origin and not as an asset that can be traded.

For international parties, including those with no other connection to the UAE who opt into the DIFC Courts’ jurisdiction, this strengthens the case for opting into the DIFC Courts. Speed of verification matters most in urgent situations, such as freezing orders, enforcement steps and dealings with banks. Having a single, unified way to evidence an order makes the DIFC Courts an even more attractive forum.

The credential answers an evidential question: is this really the document issued by the DIFC Courts, and has it been altered? It does not answer the separate legal question of whether another court, regulator or authority will recognise or enforce it. It will be interesting to see whether other jurisdictions follow this approach and move towards a common way of verifying court documents. 

Tags

dispute resolution, middle east, commercial disputes